CIVIC CHARTER

For program owners & submitters

One system of record from intake to approval.

Civic Charter is built so agency teams stop chasing status in inboxes. You submit AI use cases once, watch them move through risk classification and review, and keep evidence and artifacts attached to a single auditable record.

The platform may prepare, route, and draft. It does not replace named human approval for high-risk paths.

Intake → risk tier → reviewer lanes → gates → artifacts → publish (where policy requires disclosure).

Outcomes that hold up in briefings

  • Submit once, reuse everywhere

    Intake captures context, data classification, and vendor links so downstream reviews do not restart from scratch.

  • Status you can defend

    Every stage (intake, classification, review, gates) is visible so program owners know what is blocking progress.

  • Evidence stays on the record

    Uploads and reviewer requests attach to the use case so legal, privacy, security, and procurement share one thread.

  • Artifacts with lineage

    Impact drafts and other outputs stay linked to the case, with draft labels until reviewers approve where required.

How your work moves through the platform

This is the spine every other role plugs into. Your submission is the anchor for reviewers, leaders, auditors, vendors, and, when appropriate, the public record.
  1. 01

    Intake

    Structured submission replaces scattered email threads as the starting point.

  2. 02

    Classify

    Policy inputs recommend a risk tier; overrides require a reason on the audit trail.

  3. 03

    Route

    Work lands in the right reviewer lanes with clear checks before the workflow advances.

  4. 04

    Respond

    You answer requests and attach evidence without losing version context.

  5. 05

    Ship

    Gated approvals and publication-ready transparency stay tied to named human decisions.

Built-in governance mechanics

  • Tenant boundaries

    Agency records are isolated by design across workflows, exports, and generated artifacts.

  • Human gates

    High-risk moves require named reviewer sign-off. There is no silent auto-approval.

  • Recurring review

    Pilots and production systems can carry next-review dates so governance does not go stale.

  • Vendor context

    Trust profiles attach where a vendor is in scope so procurement and security see consistent evidence.

  • Transparency when required

    Public pages are controlled outputs: reviewed summaries, not raw drafts or internal notes.

  • Dashboards for leadership

    The same record rolls up to portfolio views for executives and oversight, without you re-keying status.

Inside the workspace

Illustrative UI only. Explore overview, detail, and record tabs to see how intake, tasks, and provenance appear together.

Illustrative preview

Civic Charter

Agency teams

Interactive marketing preview. Not live customer data.

Agency workspace

Submit once, track reviewer tasks, and keep evidence attached to the record.

Open tasks3
Artifacts linkedImpact draft

What Civic Charter is not

It is not a shadow IT tracker for individual employees. It is not a chatbot that auto-approves high-risk pilots. It does not publish internal reviewer notes or unreviewed drafts to the public web.